Quadro P620 vs NVS 3100M

Place in the ranking	1231	470
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.61	16.37
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GT218	GP107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	512
Core clock speed	606 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1443 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.848	46.18
Floating-point processing power	0.04698 TFLOPS	1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	16
TMUs	8	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	790 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.64 GB/s	96.13 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	1.2	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 3100M 0.53

Quadro P620 9.51
+1694%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 3100M 204

Quadro P620 3655
+1692%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

NVS 3100M 1121

Quadro P620 25105
+2141%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

2−3

−2300%

48
+2300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −400%	24−27 +400%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −814%	64 +814%
Fortnite	0−1	55−60
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1463%	125 +1463%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −400%	24−27 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
World of Tanks	16−18 −763%	130−140 +763%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −471%	40−45 +471%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −825%	70−75 +825%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −1433%	45−50 +1433%
World of Tanks	1−2 −6700%	65−70 +6700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	8−9
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Valorant	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Dota 2	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −2700%	27−30 +2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	8−9
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Dota 2	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
Valorant	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	30 +0%	30 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	6 +0%	6 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Dota 2	83 +0%	83 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Fortnite	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how NVS 3100M and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 2300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P620 is 6700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P620 is ahead in 34 tests (56%)
there's a draw in 27 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.53	9.51
Recency	7 January 2010	1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	40 Watt

NVS 3100M has 185.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has a 1694.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 3100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.