Quadro FX 350 vs NVS 310

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1148not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGF119G72
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 June 2012 (11 years ago)20 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data
Current price$80 (0.5x MSRP)$80

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed523 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors292 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt21 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1842.200
Floating-point performance100.4 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length156 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz810 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s6.48 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 310 246
+189%
FX 350 85

NVS 310 outperforms Quadro FX 350 by 189% in Passmark.

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 26 June 2012 20 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 21 Watt

We couldn't decide between NVS 310 and Quadro FX 350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 310
NVS 310
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 65 votes

Rate NVS 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.