GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830

Place in the ranking	1019	280
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Power efficiency	3.96	27.89
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Broadway	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	1024
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	1,040 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	24 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	95.04
Floating-point processing power	0.8 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5830 1.29

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 18.92
+1367%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 5830 4785

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+809%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −1833%	58 +1833%
1440p	2−3 −2050%	43 +2050%
4K	1−2 −2400%	25 +2400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −500%	42 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1375%	59 +1375%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −5800%	59 +5800%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −414%	36 +414%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −900%	40 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −956%	95 +956%
Metro Exodus	0−1	66
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −529%	44 +529%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −329%	30 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −700%	32 +700%
Dota 2	1−2 −8900%	90 +8900%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −536%	70 +536%
Fortnite	6−7 −1683%	100−110 +1683%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −733%	75 +733%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −3700%	76 +3700%
Metro Exodus	0−1	45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −807%	130−140 +807%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −314%	29 +314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −814%	60−65 +814%
World of Tanks	27−30 −703%	230−240 +703%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −257%	25 +257%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −625%	29 +625%
Dota 2	1−2 −11100%	112 +11100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −509%	65−70 +509%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −600%	63 +600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −807%	130−140 +807%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −2050%	170−180 +2050%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	17
World of Tanks	8−9 −1613%	130−140 +1613%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −2700%	28 +2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Valorant	6−7 −767%	50−55 +767%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	10−11
Dota 2	16−18 −113%	30−35 +113%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −1425%	60−65 +1425%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2100%	22 +2100%
Counter-Strike 2	0−1	10−11
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −200%	6 +200%
Dota 2	16−18 −225%	52 +225%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2500%	24−27 +2500%
Valorant	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5	68 +0%	68 +0%
Valorant	98 +0%	98 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5	45 +0%	45 +0%
Valorant	48 +0%	48 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5	47 +0%	47 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +0%	41 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

14−16

+0%

14−16

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	14 +0%	14 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5830 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1833% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2050% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 11100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 42 tests (74%)
there's a draw in 15 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.29	18.92
Recency	7 January 2010	23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	24 Watt	50 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5830 has 108.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1366.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5830 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.