RTX A4500 Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 545v with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms ATI Mobility HD 545v by a whopping 11981% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1280 | 80 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.72 | 22.20 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | M93 | GA104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | 5888 |
| Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 242 million | 17,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 5.440 | 276.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1088 TFLOPS | 17.66 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 96 |
| TMUs | 8 | 184 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 184 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 46 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 750 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 12 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−791%
|
95−100
+791%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3167%
|
95−100
+3167%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−791%
|
95−100
+791%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3167%
|
95−100
+3167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−3683%
|
220−230
+3683%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−2050%
|
85−90
+2050%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−791%
|
95−100
+791%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3167%
|
95−100
+3167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−1213%
|
100−110
+1213%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−3683%
|
220−230
+3683%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2900%
|
210−220
+2900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−2050%
|
85−90
+2050%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−3180%
|
160−170
+3180%
|
| World of Tanks | 14−16
−1893%
|
270−280
+1893%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−791%
|
95−100
+791%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3167%
|
95−100
+3167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−1213%
|
100−110
+1213%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−3683%
|
220−230
+3683%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−2900%
|
210−220
+2900%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1033%
|
30−35
+1033%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−8650%
|
170−180
+8650%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1533%
|
45−50
+1533%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−3500%
|
140−150
+3500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−1975%
|
80−85
+1975%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−2920%
|
150−160
+2920%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−520%
|
90−95
+520%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−520%
|
90−95
+520%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−14900%
|
150−160
+14900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−520%
|
90−95
+520%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1000%
|
21−24
+1000%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−520%
|
90−95
+520%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−8000%
|
80−85
+8000%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 280−290
+0%
|
280−290
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 14900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (51%)
- there's a draw in 31 test (49%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.36 | 43.49 |
| Recency | 5 May 2010 | 22 March 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 545v has 833.3% lower power consumption.
RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 11980.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 545v in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 545v is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
