RTX A4500 Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5145 with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5145
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.36

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5145 by a whopping 10333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1316118
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.9321.59
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM92GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)22 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores805888
Core clock speed720 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors242 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate5.760276.0
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache16 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9300%
90−95
+9300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1780%
90−95
+1780%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9300%
90−95
+9300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3750%
150−160
+3750%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1780%
90−95
+1780%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2129%
150−160
+2129%
Valorant 27−30
−756%
230−240
+756%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1753%
270−280
+1753%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9300%
90−95
+9300%
Dota 2 10−11
−1350%
140−150
+1350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3750%
150−160
+3750%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1780%
90−95
+1780%
Metro Exodus 0−1 95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2129%
150−160
+2129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2780%
140−150
+2780%
Valorant 27−30
−756%
230−240
+756%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9300%
90−95
+9300%
Dota 2 10−11
−1350%
140−150
+1350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3750%
150−160
+3750%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1780%
90−95
+1780%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2129%
150−160
+2129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2780%
140−150
+2780%
Valorant 27−30
−756%
230−240
+756%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−5000%
100−110
+5000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−27900%
280−290
+27900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4275%
170−180
+4275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11400%
110−120
+11400%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 75−80

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 100−110

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−480%
85−90
+480%
Valorant 2−3
−12100%
240−250
+12100%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 27900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile performs better in 30 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 37.56
Recency 7 January 2010 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 140 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5145 has 833.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 10333.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5145 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5145 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
Mobility Radeon HD 5145
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 45 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 43 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5145 or RTX A4500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.