Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 545v and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 545v
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.33

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms Mobility HD 545v by a whopping 2609% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1336492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.78no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameM93Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804
Core clock speed680 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.440no data
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12_2
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50
+1150%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−386%
30−35
+386%
Valorant 24−27
−254%
90−95
+254%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−2400%
350−400
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Dota 2 10−11
−2600%
270−280
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−875%
39
+875%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Metro Exodus 0−1 18−20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−386%
30−35
+386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−254%
90−95
+254%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Dota 2 10−11
−2600%
270−280
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−650%
30
+650%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−386%
30−35
+386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2500%
130−140
+2500%
Valorant 24−27
−254%
90−95
+254%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 12−14

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Valorant 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
+0%
15
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) performs better in 20 tests (35%)
  • there's a draw in 37 tests (65%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 8.94
Recency 5 May 2010 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 2609.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 545v in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 25 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 545v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 17 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 545v or Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.