Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
545v 2600 3470 3650 3670 3870 X2 4330 4570 4650 4870 4870 X2 5145
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 2-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4-Core iGPU (Arc) 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 545v and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 545v
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.36

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms Mobility HD 545v by a whopping 3128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI Mobility HD 545v Mobility HD 545v
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1339454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.85no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)no data
GPU code nameM93no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8032
Core clock speed680 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2450 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.440no data
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth12 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)no data
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−132

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%
Valorant 24−27
−308%
100−110
+308%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1027%
160−170
+1027%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
Valorant 24−27
−308%
100−110
+308%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
Valorant 24−27
−2977%
800−850
+2977%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−8800%
85−90
+8800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 24−27

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−64.3%
21−24
+64.3%
Valorant 2−3
−3050%
60−65
+3050%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 8800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 23 tests (43%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (57%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.36 11.62
Recency 5 May 2010 5 January 2026

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 3128% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 15 years.

The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 545v in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI Mobility HD 545v Mobility Radeon HD 545v
vs
GeForce 305M GeForce 305M
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
vs
R9 M395 Radeon R9 M395
ATI Mobility HD 545v Mobility Radeon HD 545v
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4550 Mobility Radeon HD 4550
ATI Mobility HD 3650 ATI Radeon HD 3650
vs
7900 GX2 7900 GX2
ATI Mobility HD 3650 ATI Radeon HD 3650
vs
8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
ATI Mobility HD 5145 ATI Radeon HD 5145
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder 9500 9500
ATI Mobility HD 5145 ATI Radeon HD 5145
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 5000 Ada Generation
ATI Mobility HD 545v ATI Radeon HD 545v
vs
E9171 MCM E9171 MCM
ATI Mobility HD 4570 ATI Radeon HD 4570
vs
FX 5700 EP 5700 EP
ATI Mobility HD 4570 ATI Radeon HD 4570
vs
Tesla K40t K40t
ATI Mobility HD 4570 ATI Radeon HD 4570
vs
Graphics 384SP 384SP
ATI Mobility HD 4570 ATI Radeon HD 4570
vs
HD 6970M X2 6970M X2
FX 570M NVIDIA FX 570M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5470 5470

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 25 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 545v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 545v or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.