Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4870 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms Mobility HD 4870 by a whopping 376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 933 | 499 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Xe LPG (2023−2025) |
| GPU code name | M98 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 January 2009 (17 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 800 | 4 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1950 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 956 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.00 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.88 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 40 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 888 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 56.83 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12_2 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 28
+12%
| 25
−12%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−333%
|
13
+333%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−350%
|
18−20
+350%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 2−3
−850%
|
18−20
+850%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−760%
|
40−45
+760%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−267%
|
11
+267%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−350%
|
18−20
+350%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−520%
|
30−35
+520%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−344%
|
40−45
+344%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−355%
|
50
+355%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−650%
|
30−33
+650%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−218%
|
35−40
+218%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−138%
|
90−95
+138%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−760%
|
40−45
+760%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−333%
|
13
+333%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
−363%
|
190−200
+363%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−355%
|
100−105
+355%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−380%
|
24
+380%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−544%
|
55−60
+544%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−255%
|
39
+255%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−650%
|
30−33
+650%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−275%
|
15
+275%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−533%
|
18−20
+533%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−218%
|
35−40
+218%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−138%
|
90−95
+138%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−760%
|
40−45
+760%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−355%
|
100−105
+355%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−520%
|
30−35
+520%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−173%
|
30
+173%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−218%
|
35−40
+218%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−338%
|
35−40
+338%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−138%
|
90−95
+138%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
−344%
|
40−45
+344%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−393%
|
70−75
+393%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
−150%
|
50−55
+150%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−364%
|
65−70
+364%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−567%
|
20−22
+567%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−360%
|
21−24
+360%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−42.9%
|
20−22
+42.9%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−350%
|
45−50
+350%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−350%
|
18−20
+350%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−1500%
|
16−18
+1500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
Full HD
High
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 4870 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:
- ATI Mobility HD 4870 is 12% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) performs better in 35 tests (60%)
- there's a draw in 23 tests (40%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.01 | 9.57 |
| Recency | 9 January 2009 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 5 nm |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 376.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
