Arc Pro A30M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850

Place in the ranking	952	351
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	21.00
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	M98	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	9 January 2009 (16 years ago)	8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	1024
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	956 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	128.0
Floating-point processing power	0.8 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	850 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	54.4 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−797%

350−400
+797%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Dota 2	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Fortnite	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
World of Tanks	30−35 −809%	300−310 +809%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Dota 2	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −817%	110−120 +817%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −782%	150−160 +782%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −809%	100−105 +809%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
World of Tanks	10−11 −800%	90−95 +800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −800%	27−30 +800%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −817%	55−60 +817%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −800%	45−50 +800%
Valorant	7−8 −757%	60−65 +757%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Dota 2	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −767%	130−140 +767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −767%	130−140 +767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −775%	70−75 +775%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Dota 2	16−18 −775%	140−150 +775%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Valorant	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4850 and Arc Pro A30M compete in popular games:

Arc Pro A30M is 797% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.65	15.25
Recency	9 January 2009	8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	6 nm

Arc Pro A30M has a 824.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro A30M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.