FirePro W4150M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1050not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.39no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameM96Mars
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed675 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistors514 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate21.6020.40
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

W4150M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and FirePro W4150M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook card while FirePro W4150M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
AMD FirePro W4150M
FirePro W4150M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.