FirePro M4150 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Place in the ranking	1050	830
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.37	no data
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	M96	Opal
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)	16 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	384
Core clock speed	675 MHz	715 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	21.60	17.16
Floating-point processing power	0.432 TFLOPS	0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	32	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−100%

6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −103%	65−70 +103%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −103%	65−70 +103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −92.9%	27−30 +92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −103%	65−70 +103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −100%	12−14 +100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−100%

8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−100%

6−7
+100%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.20	2.46
Recency	9 January 2009	16 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	28 nm

FirePro M4150 has a 105% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro M4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.