GeForce GT 630 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

Place in the ranking	1177	928
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.08
Power efficiency	1.36	1.86
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	M88	GF108
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 June 2008 (16 years ago)	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$99.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	96
Core clock speed	580 MHz	810 MHz
Number of transistors	666 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.280	12.96
Floating-point processing power	0.3712 TFLOPS	0.311 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	16	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	750 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Fortnite	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
World of Tanks	18−20 −137%	45−50 +137%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
World of Tanks	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Valorant	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Valorant	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.69	1.76
Recency	4 June 2008	15 May 2012
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3850 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

GT 630, on the other hand, has a 155.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3850 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.