GeForce GT 625M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3850 and GeForce GT 625M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3850
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.67

GT 625M outperforms ATI Mobility HD 3850 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11901052
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.365.85
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameM88GF117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32096
Core clock speed580 MHzUp to 625 MHz
Number of transistors666 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate9.28010.00
Floating-point processing power0.3712 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/sUp to 14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 API
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Valorant 27−30
−13.8%
30−35
+13.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−47.4%
27−30
+47.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Valorant 27−30
−13.8%
30−35
+13.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Valorant 27−30
−13.8%
30−35
+13.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 625M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 625M is ahead in 30 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 1.24
Recency 4 June 2008 1 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

GT 625M has a 85.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 625M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GeForce GT 625M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 37 votes

Rate GeForce GT 625M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3850 or GeForce GT 625M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.