GeForce 800M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3850 and GeForce 800M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3850
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.68

800M outperforms Mobility HD 3850 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12371119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.505.85
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameM88GF117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)17 March 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32048
Core clock speed580 MHz738 MHz
Number of transistors666 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate9.2805.904
Floating-point processing power0.3712 TFLOPS0.1417 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs168
L1 Cacheno data64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Valorant 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Valorant 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 1.14
Recency 4 June 2008 17 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce 800M has a 68% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 133% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 800M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 80 votes

Rate GeForce 800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3850 or GeForce 800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.