GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated325
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data26.64
Power efficiencyno data19.33
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM9TU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2002 (23 years ago)23 April 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5896
Core clock speed240 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed240 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors36 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate0.9693.24
Floating-point processing powerno data2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs456
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2002 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9000 and GeForce GTX 1650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9000 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 8 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 28366 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9000 or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.