GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated325
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data26.64
Power efficiencyno data19.33
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRC300TU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2003 (22 years ago)23 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3896
Core clock speed300 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors76 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate0.693.24
Floating-point processing powerno data2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs256
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2003 23 April 2019
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP and GeForce GTX 1650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 28096 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.