ATI Radeon 9600 PRO vs GeForce FX Go 5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce FX Go 5200 with Radeon 9600 PRO, including specs and performance data.

FX Go 5200
2003
32 MB DDR
0.02

9600 PRO outperforms FX Go 5200 by a whopping 400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15561511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.43
Architectureno dataR300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameNV31MRV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5no data
Core clock speed1 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR9.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX Go 5200 0.02
ATI 9600 PRO 0.10
+400%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX Go 5200 8
Samples: 29
ATI 9600 PRO 42
+425%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Valorant 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Valorant 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Valorant 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−400%
70−75
+400%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.02 0.10
Recency 1 March 2003 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

ATI 9600 PRO has a 400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 9600 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5200 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9600 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
GeForce FX Go 5200
ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 26 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 78 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX Go 5200 or Radeon 9600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.