ATI R200 vs ATI Mobility 128 M3
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
| GPU code name | M3 | R200 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 February 2000 (24 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Boost clock speed | 105 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 60 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 150 nm |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 8 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
We couldn't decide between Mobility 128 M3 and R200. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobility 128 M3 is a notebook card while R200 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
