GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 and GeForce FX 5200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 6450 GDDR5 outperforms FX 5200 by a whopping 4750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1120 | 1494 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.48 | no data |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Celsius (1999−2005) |
| GPU code name | Caicos | NV18 C1 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 April 2011 (13 years ago) | 6 March 2003 (21 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $69.99 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 160 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 29 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1.000 |
| ROPs | no data | 2 |
| TMUs | no data | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | AGP 8x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 8.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 7 | -0−1 |
| Full HD | 15 | -0−1 |
| 1200p | 5 | -0−1 |
Cost per frame, $
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 29 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 5−6 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.97 | 0.02 |
| Recency | 18 April 2011 | 6 March 2003 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 150 nm |
HD 6450 GDDR5 has a 4750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
