GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) and GeForce GT 650M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GT 650M SLI outperforms Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 725 | 640 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2017) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU code name | Surface Book | N13E-GE |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 October 2015 (9 years ago) | 22 March 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 790 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 835 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Shared memory | - | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0 | 11 |
CUDA | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 55−60
−43.6%
| 79
+43.6%
|
Full HD | 28
−78.6%
| 50
+78.6%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−46.2%
|
18−20
+46.2%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
Fortnite | 18−20
−47.4%
|
27−30
+47.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−37.5%
|
21−24
+37.5%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−46.2%
|
18−20
+46.2%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 60−65
−121%
|
139
+121%
|
Dota 2 | 30−35
−28.1%
|
40−45
+28.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
Fortnite | 18−20
−47.4%
|
27−30
+47.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−37.5%
|
21−24
+37.5%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 10−11
−60%
|
16−18
+60%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−46.2%
|
18−20
+46.2%
|
Dota 2 | 30−35
−28.1%
|
40−45
+28.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−37.5%
|
21−24
+37.5%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−26.7%
|
18−20
+26.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−30%
|
12−14
+30%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 18−20
−47.4%
|
27−30
+47.4%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 24−27
−38.5%
|
35−40
+38.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−37.5%
|
10−12
+37.5%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Dota 2 | 10−12
−45.5%
|
16−18
+45.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
Atomic Heart | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Atomic Heart | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Valorant | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Valorant | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Valorant | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Valorant | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) and GT 650M SLI compete in popular games:
- GT 650M SLI is 44% faster in 900p
- GT 650M SLI is 79% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 650M SLI is 200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GT 650M SLI is ahead in 32 tests (54%)
- there's a draw in 27 tests (46%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.17 | 4.37 |
Recency | 1 October 2015 | 22 March 2012 |
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) has an age advantage of 3 years.
GT 650M SLI, on the other hand, has a 37.9% higher aggregate performance score.
The GeForce GT 650M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.