GeForce GT 220 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 with GeForce GT 220, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.96
+1679%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 1679% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4761254
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.69
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGT216
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9648
Core clock speedno data625 MHz
Number of transistorsno data486 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data9.840
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1277 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data790 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataVGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF + HDA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_111.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD350−400
+1567%
21
−1567%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Fortnite 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Valorant 90−95
+229%
27−30
−229%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+759%
16−18
−759%
Dota 2 65−70
+527%
10−12
−527%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Fortnite 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Valorant 90−95
+229%
27−30
−229%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Dota 2 65−70
+527%
10−12
−527%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+950%
4−5
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
Valorant 100−110
+1700%
6−7
−1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Valorant 50−55
+1567%
3−4
−1567%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Dota 2 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dead Island 2 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dead Island 2 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dead Island 2 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dead Island 2 0−1 0−1
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GT 220 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 1567% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 3600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 21 tests (68%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (32%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.96 0.56
Recency 15 August 2020 12 October 2009
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 1678.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 220 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2863 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 834 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Xe Graphics G7 or GeForce GT 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.