Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130
Comparison of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130 architecture, market type and release date.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
79.2 GTexel / s
29.81 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
40.1 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Iris Pro Graphics P580 6.60
GeForce MX130 7.68 +16.4%
Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020 +2.2%
GeForce MX130 1976
Let's see how good Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
More pipelines (576 vs 384)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 30 watts)
Quick Sync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX130
16.4% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (17 November 2017 vs 1 September 2015)
GPU Boost 2.0 (increases NVIDIA GPU voltage and frequency when there's a temperature headroom. Similar to AMD PowerTune)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
GeForce Experience (software suite built to manage NVIDIA GPU parameters, and to record and stream game video)
So, Iris Pro Graphics P580 or MX130?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce MX130.
Should you still have questions on choice between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and GeForce MX130, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.