Radeon RX Vega 7 vs Iris Plus Graphics G5 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 528 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 12 |
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Vega (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | no data | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12_1 |
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
