GeForce GT 710 PCI vs Iris Plus Graphics 655

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking658not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eGF119
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4848
Core clock speed300 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt29 Watt
Texture fill rate50.406.480
Floating-point processing power0.8064 gflops0.1555 gflops
ROPs64
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3/DDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1334 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.67 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.103N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2017 2 April 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 29 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 655 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 93.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and GeForce GT 710 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCI
GeForce GT 710 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 324 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 57 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.