UHD Graphics 750 vs Iris Graphics 5100

Place in the ranking	900	657
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.47	20.81
Architecture	Generation 7.5 (2013)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	Haswell GT3	Rocket Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2013 (11 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	256
Core clock speed	200 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	1,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	44.00	20.80
Floating-point processing power	0.704 TFLOPS	0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	8
TMUs	40	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	Ring Bus
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Graphics 5100 1.93

UHD Graphics 750 4.49
+133%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Graphics 5100 746

UHD Graphics 750 1733
+132%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12 −125%	27−30 +125%
4K	7 −129%	16−18 +129%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−125%

9−10
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −25.7%	40−45 +25.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −25.7%	40−45 +25.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −25.7%	40−45 +25.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−200%

12−14
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −180%	27−30 +180%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−60%

8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−200%

3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

3−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

This is how Iris Graphics 5100 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is 125% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics 750 is 129% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 48 tests (80%)
there's a draw in 12 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.93	4.49
Recency	27 May 2013	30 March 2021
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	15 Watt

UHD Graphics 750 has a 132.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Graphics 5100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Graphics 5100 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.