RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs ION 2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ION 2 with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ION 2
2008
20 Watt
0.30

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms ION 2 by a whopping 15643% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking139182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1636.37
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGT218AD104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165120
Core clock speed500 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors260 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000247.2
Floating-point processing power0.03424 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cache32 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.28.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−15614%
1100−1150
+15614%
Valorant 24−27
−15477%
4050−4100
+15477%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−15614%
2200−2250
+15614%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 9−10
−15456%
1400−1450
+15456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−15614%
1100−1150
+15614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−15477%
4050−4100
+15477%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
Dota 2 9−10
−15456%
1400−1450
+15456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−15614%
1100−1150
+15614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−14900%
750−800
+14900%
Valorant 24−27
−15477%
4050−4100
+15477%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−14900%
450−500
+14900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−15614%
2200−2250
+15614%
Valorant 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−14900%
150−160
+14900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 47.23
Recency 3 June 2008 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 100 Watt

ION 2 has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 15643% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the ION 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that ION 2 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 27 votes

Rate ION 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 48 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about ION 2 or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.