UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 571% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1318 | 874 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.43 |
| Architecture | Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011) | Gen. 11 (2021) |
| GPU code name | Sandy Bridge | Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 4.8 - 10 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 7
−85.7%
| 13
+85.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−53.8%
|
40−45
+53.8%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10
−330%
|
40−45
+330%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−70%
|
17
+70%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−60%
|
8
+60%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−53.8%
|
40−45
+53.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−60%
|
16
+60%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+25%
|
4
−25%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−53.8%
|
40−45
+53.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−600%
|
21−24
+600%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 86% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is 25% faster.
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is 600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is ahead in 27 tests (52%)
- there's a draw in 24 tests (46%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.31 | 2.08 |
| Recency | 1 May 2011 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 571% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
