RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
2011
0.33

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 14212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking136882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data36.37
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeAD104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 May 2011 (14 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores65120
Core clock speed350 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data247.2
Floating-point processing powerno data15.82 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−14186%
1000−1050
+14186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14186%
1000−1050
+14186%
Valorant 24−27
−14131%
3700−3750
+14131%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10
−13900%
1400−1450
+13900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Dota 2 10−11
−13900%
1400−1450
+13900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14186%
1000−1050
+14186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−13900%
700−750
+13900%
Valorant 24−27
−14131%
3700−3750
+14131%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Dota 2 10−11
−13900%
1400−1450
+13900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14186%
1000−1050
+14186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−13900%
700−750
+13900%
Valorant 24−27
−14131%
3700−3750
+14131%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−13233%
400−450
+13233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−13650%
550−600
+13650%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14186%
2000−2050
+14186%
Valorant 2−3
−13900%
280−290
+13900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−13900%
280−290
+13900%

This is how HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 14186% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 47.23
Recency 1 May 2011 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 14212.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 101 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 47 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.