HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), including specs and performance data.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
55.62
+16755%

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) by a whopping 16755% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking501367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency35.65no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)
GPU code nameAD103Sandy Bridge
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2023 (2 years ago)1 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97286
Core clock speed1425 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed2115 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate643.0no data
Floating-point processing power41.15 TFLOPSno data
ROPs112no data
TMUs304no data
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data
L1 Cache9.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1150−1200
+16329%
7
−16329%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10
+0%
10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is 16329% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 30 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 55.62 0.33
Recency 21 March 2023 1 May 2011
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 16754.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 70 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 101 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile or HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.