Quadro T500 Mobile vs HD Graphics P630

#ad 
Buy
HD Graphics P530 HD Graphics P630
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P630 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.68

T500 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
T500 Mobile Quadro T500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking775500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.1634.16
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 August 2016 (8 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed350 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4094.92
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−200%
36
+200%
1440p5−6
−200%
15
+200%
4K5−6
−240%
17
+240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
Fortnite 14−16
−240%
50−55
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Valorant 45−50
−82.6%
80−85
+82.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−138%
130−140
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Dota 2 27−30
−221%
90
+221%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−367%
28
+367%
Fortnite 14−16
−240%
50−55
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
−288%
31
+288%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−211%
28
+211%
Valorant 45−50
−82.6%
80−85
+82.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Dota 2 27−30
−168%
75
+168%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−350%
27
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−111%
19
+111%
Valorant 45−50
−183%
130−140
+183%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−240%
50−55
+240%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−210%
65−70
+210%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−180%
70−75
+180%
Valorant 27−30
−239%
95−100
+239%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−186%
20−22
+186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%
Valorant 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 8−9
−250%
28
+250%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

1440p
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how HD Graphics P630 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 200% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 200% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 240% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics P630 is 14% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T500 Mobile is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics P630 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • T500 Mobile is ahead in 39 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.68 7.76
Recency 5 August 2016 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 18 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has 20% lower power consumption.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 189.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 17.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
HD Graphics 6000 HD Graphics 6000
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
HD Graphics 405 HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
Plex 2100 S4 Quadro Plex 2100 S4
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
vs
RX 490M Radeon RX 490M
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
vs
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
vs
GRID K500 GRID K500

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 111 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics P630 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.