Quadro T500 Mobile vs HD Graphics P630
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics P630 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
T500 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 190% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 766 | 491 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.27 | 34.45 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 2 December 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm++ | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 18 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 94.92 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4224 TFLOPS | 3.037 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 3 | 32 |
| TMUs | 24 | 56 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 12−14
−200%
| 36
+200%
|
| 1440p | 5−6
−200%
| 15
+200%
|
| 4K | 5−6
−240%
| 17
+240%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−263%
|
27−30
+263%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8
+14.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−140%
|
35−40
+140%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−633%
|
21−24
+633%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−118%
|
24−27
+118%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−750%
|
30−35
+750%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−263%
|
27−30
+263%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6
−16.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−900%
|
90
+900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−55.6%
|
28
+55.6%
|
| Fortnite | 16−18
−212%
|
50−55
+212%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−140%
|
35−40
+140%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−633%
|
21−24
+633%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9−10
−244%
|
31
+244%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−300%
|
24−27
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
−154%
|
70−75
+154%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−118%
|
24−27
+118%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−155%
|
28
+155%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−750%
|
30−35
+750%
|
| World of Tanks | 55−60
−142%
|
130−140
+142%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−263%
|
27−30
+263%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−173%
|
30−33
+173%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+40%
|
5
−40%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−733%
|
75
+733%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−50%
|
27
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−140%
|
35−40
+140%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
−154%
|
70−75
+154%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−550%
|
13
+550%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−186%
|
60−65
+186%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| World of Tanks | 21−24
−186%
|
60−65
+186%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−467%
|
16−18
+467%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−138%
|
18−20
+138%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−170%
|
27−30
+170%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−181%
|
45−50
+181%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14
−7.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−200%
|
6−7
+200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−18.8%
|
18−20
+18.8%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−75%
|
28
+75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−1000%
|
10−12
+1000%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics P630 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:
- T500 Mobile is 200% faster in 1080p
- T500 Mobile is 200% faster in 1440p
- T500 Mobile is 240% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics P630 is 40% faster.
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T500 Mobile is 1000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics P630 is ahead in 3 tests (6%)
- T500 Mobile is ahead in 38 tests (70%)
- there's a draw in 13 tests (24%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.03 | 8.78 |
| Recency | 5 August 2016 | 2 December 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 18 Watt |
HD Graphics P630 has 20% lower power consumption.
T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 189.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 17.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro T500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
