Quadro T2000 Mobile vs HD Graphics P630

Place in performance ranking	718	248
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	4.69
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	5 August 2016 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$1449	$2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T2000 Mobile has 23350% better value for money than HD Graphics P630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	1024
Core clock speed	no data	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	114.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics P630 and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P630 3.10

T2000 Mobile 20.63
+565%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 565% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics P630 1198

T2000 Mobile 7985
+567%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics P630 by 567% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−450%

30−35
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	35−40
Battlefield 5	7−8 −886%	65−70 +886%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −315%	50−55 +315%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −450%	30−35 +450%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −980%	50−55 +980%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −788%	70−75 +788%
Hitman 3	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −780%	40−45 +780%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −467%	30−35 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −340%	40−45 +340%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	35−40
Battlefield 5	7−8 −886%	65−70 +886%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −315%	50−55 +315%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −450%	30−35 +450%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −980%	50−55 +980%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −788%	70−75 +788%
Hitman 3	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −780%	40−45 +780%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −725%	30−35 +725%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −467%	30−35 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −340%	40−45 +340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	35−40
Battlefield 5	7−8 −886%	65−70 +886%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −450%	30−35 +450%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −980%	50−55 +980%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −788%	70−75 +788%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −520%	30−35 +520%
Hitman 3	6−7 −450%	30−35 +450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Hitman 3	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 2100% faster than the HD Graphics P630.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, T2000 Mobile surpassed HD Graphics P630 in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.10	20.63
Recency	5 August 2016	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1740 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	60 Watt