GeForce RTX 5080 vs HD Graphics P630
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics P630 and GeForce RTX 5080, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 5080 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 2913% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 818 | 10 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 49.13 |
| Power efficiency | 14.61 | 18.34 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | GB203 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 August 2016 (9 years ago) | 30 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 10752 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 2295 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 2617 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 45,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm++ | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 360 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 879.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.4224 TFLOPS | 56.28 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 3 | 112 |
| TMUs | 24 | 336 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 336 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 84 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 10.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 304 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1875 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 960.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 10.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 6−7
−3300%
| 204
+3300%
|
| 1440p | 5−6
−3040%
| 157
+3040%
|
| 4K | 3−4
−3467%
| 107
+3467%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 4.90 |
| 1440p | no data | 6.36 |
| 4K | no data | 9.34 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−3589%
|
300−350
+3589%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−3667%
|
220−230
+3667%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
−2038%
|
170−180
+2038%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−1870%
|
190−200
+1870%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−3589%
|
300−350
+3589%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−3667%
|
220−230
+3667%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−2863%
|
230−240
+2863%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1913%
|
300−350
+1913%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−2193%
|
300−350
+2193%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
−3357%
|
240−250
+3357%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
−2038%
|
170−180
+2038%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−1150%
|
170−180
+1150%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−1226%
|
600−650
+1226%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−1870%
|
190−200
+1870%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−3589%
|
300−350
+3589%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 55−60
−405%
|
270−280
+405%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−3667%
|
220−230
+3667%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
−2757%
|
800−850
+2757%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−2863%
|
230−240
+2863%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1913%
|
300−350
+1913%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−2193%
|
300−350
+2193%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
−3357%
|
240−250
+3357%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 8−9
−2075%
|
170−180
+2075%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
−2038%
|
170−180
+2038%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−1200%
|
65
+1200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−1150%
|
170−180
+1150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−3950%
|
400−450
+3950%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−1226%
|
600−650
+1226%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−1870%
|
190−200
+1870%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−3667%
|
220−230
+3667%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
−2757%
|
800−850
+2757%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−2863%
|
230−240
+2863%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−2193%
|
300−350
+2193%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8−9
−1913%
|
161
+1913%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−1150%
|
170−180
+1150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−2690%
|
279
+2690%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−1226%
|
600−650
+1226%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1913%
|
300−350
+1913%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−4783%
|
290−300
+4783%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−2357%
|
500−550
+2357%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−8300%
|
160−170
+8300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−17200%
|
173
+17200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−600%
|
170−180
+600%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−1696%
|
450−500
+1696%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−7050%
|
140−150
+7050%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−4500%
|
230−240
+4500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−4271%
|
300−350
+4271%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 3−4
−4133%
|
127
+4133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−5700%
|
232
+5700%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 5−6
−2920%
|
150−160
+2920%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−1069%
|
180−190
+1069%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−2257%
|
300−350
+2257%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−2900%
|
240−250
+2900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−17000%
|
170−180
+17000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−10067%
|
300−350
+10067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−3100%
|
95−100
+3100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5
−1875%
|
75−80
+1875%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 55
+0%
|
55
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 90
+0%
|
90
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 232
+0%
|
232
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 73
+0%
|
73
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics P630 and RTX 5080 compete in popular games:
- RTX 5080 is 3300% faster in 1080p
- RTX 5080 is 3040% faster in 1440p
- RTX 5080 is 3467% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5080 is 17200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5080 performs better in 54 tests (87%)
- there's a draw in 8 tests (13%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.71 | 81.66 |
| Recency | 5 August 2016 | 30 January 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 360 Watt |
HD Graphics P630 has 2300% lower power consumption.
RTX 5080, on the other hand, has a 2913.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 841.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5080 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
