GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs HD Graphics P530

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking794not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.83no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2TU116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)7 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed350 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors189 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4089.04
Floating-point processing power0.4416 TFLOPS2.849 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.971.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 7 July 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

HD Graphics P530 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 TU116, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 135.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics P530 and GeForce GTX 1650 TU116. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 23 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 77 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.