HD Graphics P530 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and HD Graphics P530, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
1650 SUPER outperforms HD Graphics P530 by a whopping 849% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 260 | 858 |
| Place by popularity | 70 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 18.67 | 13.12 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) |
| GPU code name | TU116 | Skylake GT2 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 September 2015 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 6,600 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 138.0 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.416 TFLOPS | 0.4416 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 3 |
| TMUs | 80 | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1740 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
| Multi Monitor | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 68
+871%
| 7−8
−871%
|
| 1440p | 35
+1067%
| 3−4
−1067%
|
| 4K | 21
+950%
| 2−3
−950%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 248
+3443%
|
7−8
−3443%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 63
+1160%
|
5−6
−1160%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 72
+929%
|
7−8
−929%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 72
+800%
|
8−9
−800%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 201
+2771%
|
7−8
−2771%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50
+900%
|
5−6
−900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 93
+1229%
|
7−8
−1229%
|
| Fortnite | 120−130
+831%
|
12−14
−831%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 95−100
+654%
|
12−14
−654%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 93
+1450%
|
6−7
−1450%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 54
+671%
|
7−8
−671%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+654%
|
12−14
−654%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+284%
|
40−45
−284%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 58
+625%
|
8−9
−625%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 96
+1271%
|
7−8
−1271%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 260−270
+420%
|
50−55
−420%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40
+700%
|
5−6
−700%
|
| Dota 2 | 209
+704%
|
24−27
−704%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 86
+1129%
|
7−8
−1129%
|
| Fortnite | 120−130
+831%
|
12−14
−831%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 95−100
+654%
|
12−14
−654%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 82
+1267%
|
6−7
−1267%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 103
+1617%
|
6−7
−1617%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 41
+486%
|
7−8
−486%
|
| Metro Exodus | 51
+1175%
|
4−5
−1175%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+654%
|
12−14
−654%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90
+900%
|
9−10
−900%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+284%
|
40−45
−284%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 57
+613%
|
8−9
−613%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 34
+580%
|
5−6
−580%
|
| Dota 2 | 191
+635%
|
24−27
−635%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 79
+1029%
|
7−8
−1029%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 95−100
+654%
|
12−14
−654%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 33
+371%
|
7−8
−371%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+654%
|
12−14
−654%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50
+456%
|
9−10
−456%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+284%
|
40−45
−284%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 120−130
+831%
|
12−14
−831%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 52
+767%
|
6−7
−767%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 170−180
+826%
|
18−20
−826%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 45
+1025%
|
4−5
−1025%
|
| Metro Exodus | 29 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+661%
|
21−24
−661%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+800%
|
21−24
−800%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 42
+950%
|
4−5
−950%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20
+900%
|
2−3
−900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 54
+1250%
|
4−5
−1250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+967%
|
6−7
−967%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 22
+1000%
|
2−3
−1000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+900%
|
4−5
−900%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 60−65
+1100%
|
5−6
−1100%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 45
+200%
|
14−16
−200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+1500%
|
1−2
−1500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16
+1500%
|
1−2
−1500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 32
+967%
|
3−4
−967%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+1023%
|
12−14
−1023%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24
+1100%
|
2−3
−1100%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+1150%
|
2−3
−1150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 80
+1043%
|
7−8
−1043%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
+2300%
|
1−2
−2300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+2050%
|
2−3
−2050%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and HD Graphics P530 compete in popular games:
- GTX 1650 SUPER is 871% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1650 SUPER is 1067% faster in 1440p
- GTX 1650 SUPER is 950% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 SUPER is 3443% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 1650 SUPER surpassed HD Graphics P530 in all 55 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 23.05 | 2.43 |
| Recency | 22 November 2019 | 1 September 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1740 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
GTX 1650 SUPER has a 848.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 135.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
HD Graphics P530, on the other hand, has 566.7% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P530 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
