Quadro P2200 vs HD Graphics (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Braswell) with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Braswell)
2015
0.57

P2200 outperforms HD Graphics (Braswell) by a whopping 3849% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1274283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.09
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBraswellGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)10 June 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161280
Core clock speed320 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data119.4
Floating-point processing powerno data3.822 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data480 KB
L2 Cacheno data1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountno data5 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1251 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data200.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
Valorant 27−30
−3829%
1100−1150
+3829%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−3789%
700−750
+3789%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Dota 2 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Valorant 27−30
−3829%
1100−1150
+3829%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Dota 2 10−12
−3536%
400−450
+3536%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3650%
300−310
+3650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3700%
190−200
+3700%
Valorant 27−30
−3829%
1100−1150
+3829%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−3733%
230−240
+3733%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3829%
550−600
+3829%
Valorant 3−4
−3567%
110−120
+3567%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 22.51
Recency 1 April 2015 10 June 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm

HD Graphics (Braswell) has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 3849.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Braswell) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 450 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Braswell) or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.