Quadro P4200 vs HD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy
HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 615 HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 630
VS
#ad 
Buy
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 630 with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 630
2017
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
2.68

P4200 outperforms HD Graphics 630 by a whopping 710% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking776229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.1717.21
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 January 2017 (8 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922304
Core clock speed350 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistors189 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00237.2
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs24144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 630 2.68
Quadro P4200 21.70
+710%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 630 1197
Quadro P4200 10729
+796%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−650%
120−130
+650%
1440p64
−681%
500−550
+681%
4K13
−669%
100−110
+669%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1600%
130−140
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−840%
90−95
+840%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1600%
130−140
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Far Cry 5 6
−1217%
75−80
+1217%
Fortnite 24
−388%
110−120
+388%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−571%
90−95
+571%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%
Valorant 45−50
−254%
160−170
+254%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−840%
90−95
+840%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1600%
130−140
+1600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−364%
250−260
+364%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Dota 2 26
−365%
120−130
+365%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1217%
75−80
+1217%
Fortnite 14−16
−680%
110−120
+680%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−571%
90−95
+571%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 4
−2050%
85−90
+2050%
Metro Exodus 2
−2500%
50−55
+2500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
Valorant 45−50
−254%
160−170
+254%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−840%
90−95
+840%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Dota 2 22
−450%
120−130
+450%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1217%
75−80
+1217%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−571%
90−95
+571%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
Valorant 45−50
−254%
160−170
+254%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−680%
110−120
+680%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1633%
50−55
+1633%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−695%
160−170
+695%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−2050%
40−45
+2050%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−596%
170−180
+596%
Valorant 27−30
−625%
200−210
+625%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1020%
55−60
+1020%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−175%
40−45
+175%
Valorant 14−16
−820%
130−140
+820%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 8−9
−875%
75−80
+875%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 630 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 650% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 681% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P4200 is 669% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 57 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.68 21.70
Recency 1 January 2017 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt

HD Graphics 630 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 709.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 630 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
HD 7750M Radeon HD 7750M
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
GT 650M GeForce GT 650M
R7 M445 R7 M445
vs
ATI 3100 IGP 3100 IGP
R7 M445 R7 M445
vs
RX 5600M RX 5600M
R7 M445 R7 M445
vs
Arc 3 A350M Arc 3 A350M
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
HD 6370M HD 6370M
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
SIS Mirage M661FX Mirage M661FX
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
RX 5300 XT RX 5300 XT
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
HD Graphics P630 HD Graphics P630
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 3 GB
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
R4 Mobile Graphics R4 Mobile Graphics
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
P2000 Mobile P2000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 1330 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 58 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 630 or Quadro P4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.