Quadro FX Go 1000 vs HD Graphics 620
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 801 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 41 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.48 | no data |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017) | no data |
| GPU code name | Kaby-Lake GT2 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 August 2016 (7 years ago) | 25 February 2004 (20 years ago) |
| Current price | $353 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | 4 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 25.20 | no data |
| Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on HD Graphics 620 and Quadro FX Go 1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | no data |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | 128 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 August 2016 | 25 February 2004 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 620 and Quadro FX Go 1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that HD Graphics 620 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX Go 1000 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
