Radeon HD 6410D IGP vs HD Graphics 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking960not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1SuperSumo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)20 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12160
Core clock speed300 MHz444 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate11.403.552
Floating-point processing power0.1824 gflops0.1421 gflops
ROPs34
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.97N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 20 June 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

HD Graphics 510 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 510 and Radeon HD 6410D IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 6410D IGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 510
AMD Radeon HD 6410D IGP
Radeon HD 6410D IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 363 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 74 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6410D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.