GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs HD Graphics 510
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 960 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Skylake GT1 | GF116 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 11 July 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 12 | 144 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 783 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 106 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 11.40 | 18.79 |
| Floating-point performance | 0.1824 gflops | 0.451 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 210 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | LPDDR3/DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 22.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 2.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2015 | 11 July 2012 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 106 Watt |
HD Graphics 510 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 606.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 510 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
