Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs HD Graphics 505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 505 with Radeon RX 7650 GRE, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 505
2016
8 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 10 Watt
0.91

RX 7650 GRE outperforms HD Graphics 505 by a whopping 4593% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1163108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data80.50
Power efficiency10.7718.38
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1.5Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2016 (8 years ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442048
Core clock speed200 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistors189 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate11.70345.0
Floating-point processing power0.1872 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs18128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 505 0.91
RX 7650 GRE 42.71
+4593%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 505 361
RX 7650 GRE 16992
+4607%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−4344%
400−450
+4344%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.70

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Valorant 30−35
−4577%
1450−1500
+4577%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−4465%
1050−1100
+4465%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4567%
280−290
+4567%
Valorant 30−35
−4577%
1450−1500
+4577%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4567%
280−290
+4567%
Valorant 30−35
−4577%
1450−1500
+4577%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−4588%
750−800
+4588%
Valorant 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

This is how HD Graphics 505 and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 4344% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 42.71
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 165 Watt

HD Graphics 505 has 1550% lower power consumption.

RX 7650 GRE, on the other hand, has a 4593.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 505 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 505 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 505
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 271 votes

Rate HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 505 or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.