Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs R5 M335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M335 with Radeon RX 7650 GRE, including specs and performance data.

R5 M335
2015
4 GB DDR3
1.38

RX 7650 GRE outperforms R5 M335 by a whopping 2995% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1042108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data80.50
Power efficiencyno data18.38
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameExoNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 October 2015 (9 years ago)February 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed1070 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1070 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistors690 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown165 Watt
Texture fill rate21.40345.0
Floating-point processing power0.6848 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.2
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R5 M335 1.38
RX 7650 GRE 42.71
+2995%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M335 548
RX 7650 GRE 16992
+3001%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−2627%
300−350
+2627%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Dead Island 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Dead Island 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Fortnite 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
Valorant 30−35
−2988%
1050−1100
+2988%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 26
−2977%
800−850
+2977%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Dead Island 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Dota 2 16−18
−2841%
500−550
+2841%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Fortnite 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Valorant 30−35
−2988%
1050−1100
+2988%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Dead Island 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Dota 2 16−18
−2841%
500−550
+2841%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2900%
270−280
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Valorant 30−35
−2988%
1050−1100
+2988%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−2900%
240−250
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2900%
240−250
+2900%
Valorant 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−2713%
450−500
+2713%
Valorant 7−8
−2900%
210−220
+2900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Dota 2 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

This is how R5 M335 and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 2627% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 42.71
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

RX 7650 GRE has a 2994.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M335 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M335 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M335
Radeon R5 M335
AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE
Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 156 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M335 or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.