Radeon RX 6600M vs HD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics with Radeon RX 6600M, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics
2012
35 Watt
0.78

RX 6600M outperforms HD Graphics by a whopping 4527% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1154137
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Power efficiency1.5324.84
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481792
Core clock speed650 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors392 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate6.300270.6
Floating-point processing power0.1008 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs6112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 0.78
RX 6600M 36.09
+4527%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 298
RX 6600M 13876
+4556%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 300
RX 6600M 23525
+7742%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
1440p1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
4K0−131

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+0%
110
+0%
Elden Ring 90
+0%
90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 216
+0%
216
+0%
Metro Exodus 100
+0%
100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 160
+0%
160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Elden Ring 113
+0%
113
+0%
Far Cry 5 46
+0%
46
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+0%
173
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 116
+0%
116
+0%
Metro Exodus 78
+0%
78
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+0%
54
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+0%
153
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 144
+0%
144
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 61
+0%
61
+0%
Elden Ring 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+0%
100
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how HD Graphics and RX 6600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 4850% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600M is 5200% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 36.09
Recency 1 April 2012 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

HD Graphics has 185.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600M, on the other hand, has a 4526.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6600M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 2139 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1015 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.