Quadro P620 vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 with Quadro P620, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400
2015
8 GB DDR3L, 6 Watt
1.13

Quadro P620 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1041438
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.30
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GP107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$710 $170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 400 and Quadro P620 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed320 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors189 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate7.68043.33
Floating-point performance134.4 gflops1,490 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared6000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.13 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131
CUDAno data6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 400 1.13
Quadro P620 9.41
+733%

Quadro P620 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 400 450
Quadro P620 4673
+938%

Quadro P620 outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 938% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−817%
55
+817%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−718%
180−190
+718%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−708%
210−220
+708%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−661%
350−400
+661%
Hitman 3 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−650%
300−310
+650%
Metro Exodus 35
−729%
290−300
+729%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−708%
210−220
+708%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−724%
280−290
+724%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−718%
180−190
+718%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−708%
210−220
+708%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−661%
350−400
+661%
Hitman 3 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−650%
300−310
+650%
Metro Exodus 13
−669%
100−105
+669%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−708%
210−220
+708%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−713%
260−270
+713%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−724%
280−290
+724%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−686%
110−120
+686%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−689%
150−160
+689%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−718%
180−190
+718%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−661%
350−400
+661%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−650%
300−310
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−728%
240−250
+728%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−724%
140−150
+724%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−724%
280−290
+724%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−708%
210−220
+708%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−700%
120−130
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−724%
140−150
+724%
Hitman 3 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−718%
90−95
+718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−713%
130−140
+713%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Hitman 3 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−700%
80−85
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%

This is how HD Graphics 400 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is 817% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.13 9.41
Recency 1 April 2015 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 25 Watt

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a desktop card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 379 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 559 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.