GeForce GT 240M LE vs HD Graphics 615

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking977not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.42no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2G96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 August 2016 (9 years ago)15 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19232
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate20.409.600
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs2416
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 15 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 23 Watt

HD Graphics 615 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 360% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 615 and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 615
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 87 votes

Rate HD Graphics 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 615 or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.