Arc 3 A370M vs HD Graphics 400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1075not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.13no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speed320 MHzno data
Boost clock speed600 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors189 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate7.20099.20
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

Arc 3 A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Arc 3 A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook card while Arc 3 A370M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
Intel Arc 3 A370M
Arc 3 A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 404 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 12 votes

Rate Arc 3 A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.