A30 PCIe vs HD Graphics 400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1073not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.13no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed320 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1440 MHz
Number of transistors189 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200322.6
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs12224
Tensor Coresno data224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LHBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared3072 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data933.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.3N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 165 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 2650% lower power consumption.

A30 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and A30 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook card while A30 PCIe is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
NVIDIA A30 PCIe
A30 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 404 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate A30 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.