Radeon RX 590 vs HD Graphics 3000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 3000 with Radeon RX 590, including specs and performance data.
RX 590 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 3591% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1155 | 211 |
Place by popularity | 73 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 26.35 |
Architecture | Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011) | Polaris (2016−2019) |
GPU code name | Sandy Bridge | Polaris 30 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 15 November 2018 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $279 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 12 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1469 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Number of transistors | 995 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 175 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 13.80 | 222.5 |
Floating-point performance | 20.4 gflops | no data |
Floating-point performance | 0.2208 gflops | 7.119 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 241 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 256.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 8
−1163%
| 101
+1163%
|
1440p | 1−2
−5900%
| 60
+5900%
|
4K | 1−2
−3700%
| 38
+3700%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−1525%
|
65
+1525%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−2200%
|
69
+2200%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−8900%
|
90
+8900%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−880%
|
45−50
+880%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−2636%
|
301
+2636%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−2233%
|
140
+2233%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−807%
|
272
+807%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−2725%
|
113
+2725%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−2033%
|
64
+2033%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−7000%
|
71
+7000%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−880%
|
45−50
+880%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−2509%
|
287
+2509%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1800%
|
114
+1800%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−430%
|
50−55
+430%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−770%
|
261
+770%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−875%
|
39
+875%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1433%
|
46
+1433%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−880%
|
45−50
+880%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−773%
|
96
+773%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−1567%
|
100
+1567%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−410%
|
51
+410%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−33
−16.7%
|
35
+16.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−3600%
|
35−40
+3600%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 24−27 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1400%
|
14−16
+1400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2700%
|
27−30
+2700%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−383%
|
27−30
+383%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
−2300%
|
72
+2300%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−10050%
|
203
+10050%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−1333%
|
43
+1333%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−1800%
|
19
+1800%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 42 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30
+1400%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 86
+0%
|
86
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 136
+0%
|
136
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 90
+0%
|
90
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 274
+0%
|
274
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 124
+0%
|
124
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 91
+0%
|
91
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 73
+0%
|
73
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 122
+0%
|
122
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 74
+0%
|
74
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 259
+0%
|
259
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 97
+0%
|
97
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74
+0%
|
74
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 62
+0%
|
62
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 55
+0%
|
55
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 91
+0%
|
91
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 64
+0%
|
64
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 55
+0%
|
55
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 38
+0%
|
38
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 58
+0%
|
58
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 70
+0%
|
70
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 26
+0%
|
26
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 57
+0%
|
57
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 32
+0%
|
32
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20
+0%
|
20
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics 3000 and RX 590 compete in popular games:
- RX 590 is 1163% faster in 1080p
- RX 590 is 5900% faster in 1440p
- RX 590 is 3700% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 590 is 10050% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 590 is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
- there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.66 | 24.36 |
Recency | 1 February 2011 | 15 November 2018 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 12 nm |
RX 590 has a 3590.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 590 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 590 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.