HD Graphics 400 vs HD Graphics 3000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.57

HD Graphics 400 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12061096
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.83
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+Braswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9696
Core clock speed650 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown6 Watt
Texture fill rate15.607.200
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs22
TMUs1212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3L
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.14.3
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 11
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Valorant 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Valorant 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 400 is 56% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.97
Recency 1 February 2011 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

HD Graphics 400 has a 70.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 400 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2558 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 421 vote

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 3000 or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.