GMA vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12041551
Place by popularity96not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+Cloverview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed650 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate15.601.066
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs21
TMUs122

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0c
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.1ES 2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 3000 254
+12600%
GMA 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 4−5 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 4 May 2010

HD Graphics 3000 has an age advantage of 8 months.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 3000 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
Intel GMA
GMA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2550 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 3000 or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.