Radeon Vega 7 vs HD Graphics 2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.55

Vega 7 outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 1258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1216532
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Power efficiencyno data11.37
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48448
Core clock speed850 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors189 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown45 Watt
Texture fill rate8.10053.20
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−120%
22
+120%
1440p2−3
−1500%
32
+1500%
4K1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • Vega 7 is 120% faster in 1080p
  • Vega 7 is 1500% faster in 1440p
  • Vega 7 is 1500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 7.47
Recency 1 February 2011 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm

Vega 7 has a 1258.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1325 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2089 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.